SIGNIFICANCE

17 bounded tasks

Take a check

One bounded task at a time.

Choose a passage, use the pinned source, and report what you checked and found. This list is not a ranking.

No Significance account is required. Open a task, read only its stated scope, and use the report link if you want to contribute.

TaskRecordEffortPrerequisitesStatus
Read one certificate-generation path and record the exact passages followed. 2026-alexchengyuli-erdos-848 about 60-90 minutes · estimated by significance-editor Paper definitions and finite certificate format open
Reproduce the pinned Lean release and report the build and certificate result within the published-cache replay trust boundary. 2026-alexchengyuli-erdos-848 about 2 hours for the published-cache replay; a fresh source build is separate and may take multiple days · estimated by significance-editor Lean and the repository's pinned release instructions open
Compare the paper's exact all-N statement with the pinned Lean declaration, recording both the paper version and the pinned machine-proof version. 2026-alexchengyuli-erdos-848 about 45 minutes · estimated by significance-editor the paper theorem map and Lean declaration names open
Independently build the Theorem D Lean targets and run their axiom audit at commit 3635e74826a4c1fcece7d1cd2b6fa75e43a00510. 2026-anthropic-zeta-two-thirds Not estimated None recorded open
Compare paper Theorem D with the trusted comparator statement montgomery_taylor_on_critical_line and its counting definitions. 2026-anthropic-zeta-two-thirds Not estimated None recorded open
Assess the passage from Weil-form signature data to the lower bound in Proposition 4.4 and Theorem D, against the pinned paper. 2026-anthropic-zeta-two-thirds Not estimated None recorded open
Compare the formal theorem and definitions with the informal n = 8 claim. 2026-evanbeller-erdos-132 about 60 minutes · estimated by significance-editor Lean 4 and the repository's formalization directory open
Check the n = 8 geometric deduction only; report the exact passages followed and any first unresolved step. 2026-evanbeller-erdos-132 about 90 minutes · estimated by significance-editor Planar distance geometry and the cited seven-point classification open
Trace the declaration chain between manuscript Theorem 1.1 and the Comparator target exists_finitelyPresented_nonsofic_group. 2026-openai-nonsofic-groups Not estimated None recorded open
Assess the expander-matching criterion in Proposition 2.3 or the Thompson-group step in Proposition 3.2, naming the exact artifact revision reviewed. 2026-openai-nonsofic-groups Not estimated None recorded open
Check the hypotheses of Theorem 2.2 where it is applied to the constructed circles. 2026-rafikzeraoulia-erdos-653 [FILL: editor estimate] · estimated by significance-editor Theorem 2.2 as cited in the manuscript open
Check Theorem 1.1 and the Section 3 deduction from the incidence bound to the exponent. 2026-rafikzeraoulia-erdos-653 [FILL: editor estimate] · estimated by significance-editor incidence geometry basics open
Check one short structural result: Proposition 2.1 or Theorem 6.2. 2026-rafikzeraoulia-erdos-653 Not estimated None recorded open
Check Hypothesis 3.1 and Remark 3.2 against the cited literature. 2026-rafikzeraoulia-erdos-726 [FILL: editor estimate] · estimated by significance-editor Hypothesis 3.1 and the cited literature open
Check Lemma 6.1 and the decomposition used in the proof of Theorem 1.1. 2026-rafikzeraoulia-erdos-726 Not estimated None recorded open
Optionally check Hypothesis 8.1 and Proposition 8.2. 2026-rafikzeraoulia-erdos-726 Not estimated None recorded open
Check Lemma 3.3, Proposition 5.1, and Corollary 5.2. 2026-rafikzeraoulia-erdos-726 [FILL: editor estimate] · estimated by significance-editor partial summation and smooth approximation open