Take this check

Compare the paper's exact all-N statement with the pinned Lean declaration, recording both the paper version and the pinned machine-proof version.

2026-alexchengyuli-erdos-848 · task erdos-848-statement-correspondence

Task type: statement audit
Entry points: paper/theorem-map.json and Erdos848.PaperGeneratedCertificateProvider.all_N
Source PDF: Download the exact manuscript
Pinned repository PDF (the public claim also links SSRN 7230480) · version 54a910e7bcda…
Code: Open the formalization repository · pinned commit bb8e1b10b006…
Effort: about 45 minutes (estimated by significance-editor)
Prerequisites: the paper theorem map and Lean declaration names

Status

Open.

How to do this

Download the exact manuscript above and start with the stated entry points. The version hash identifies the file for the eventual record; you do not need to calculate it before reading.
Read or reproduce only the stated scope and note the method you actually used.
Submit what you found through the linked attestation form below, using the record, task, scope, and manuscript hash shown here. No Significance account is required; GitHub may ask you to sign in.

Open attestation form

Attestation template

Fill only what you did. State what you checked and found—not whether the whole proof is correct.

id: att-erdos-848-statement-correspondence
task_id: erdos-848-statement-correspondence
reviewer: '[your name or handle]'
scope: Compare the paper's exact all-N statement with the pinned Lean 
  declaration, recording both the paper version and the pinned machine-proof 
  version.
manuscript_sha256: 
  54a910e7bcdaaaf03d24aee2685083f3b14a55be325ce54f6bc18e96bb890a8b
asserted_at: '[YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ]'
method: '[what you actually did: read / rederived / rebuilt / compared]'
finding: '[what you checked and found about exactly this scope]'
limits: '[what you did not check — optional but encouraged]'