Take this check
Assess the expander-matching criterion in Proposition 2.3 or the Thompson-group step in Proposition 3.2, naming the exact artifact revision reviewed.
- Task type
- mathematical review
- Source PDF
- Download the exact manuscript
- Code
- Open the formalization repository · pinned commit
c510a55434c0…
Status
Open.
How to do this
- Download the exact manuscript above and start with the stated entry points. The version hash identifies the file for the eventual record; you do not need to calculate it before reading.
- Read or reproduce only the stated scope and note the method you actually used.
- Submit what you found through the linked attestation form below, using the record, task, scope, and manuscript hash shown here. No Significance account is required; GitHub may ask you to sign in.
Attestation template
Fill only what you did. State what you checked and found—not whether the whole proof is correct.
id: att-task-3 task_id: task-3 reviewer: '[your name or handle]' scope: Assess the expander-matching criterion in Proposition 2.3 or the Thompson-group step in Proposition 3.2, naming the exact artifact revision reviewed. manuscript_sha256: f318c6508c9d49ef876a5a26cd73928705f96c07bb43e92a0cb35bd3f666ea53 asserted_at: '[YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ]' method: '[what you actually did: read / rederived / rebuilt / compared]' finding: '[what you checked and found about exactly this scope]' limits: '[what you did not check — optional but encouraged]'